FavoriteLoadingSave to briefcase | Rating: | By (2012)

  • PrintEmail Link
  • Viewed 3,389 times | Saved to 333 briefcases
Bettel v Yim (1978), 20 OR (2d) 617 (Co Ct)


Bettle and his friends are in Yim’s store. Yim wants them to leave. Bettle starts lighting matches in the store. Yim grabs Bettle and shakes him. Then Yim accidentally smashes his forehead into Bettle’s nose.


If there is no intention to injure, can there be a finding of battery?


A person is responsible for all damage, foreseeable or not, that results from their battery.


Even though actual harm was not intended, Y did intend to shake B
**Policy: Judge refuses to bring in reasonable foreseeability rule, since this is battery not negligence
**Must protect dignity of the plaintiff and right of plaintiff not to be touched by the defendant

Leave a Comment

You must be logged in to participate.

This document is a general discussion of certain legal and related issues and must not be relied upon as legal advice. This document may not have been written or reviewed by a legal practitioner. For more information, please see the website Terms of Service.