FavoriteLoadingSave to briefcase | Rating: | By (2012)

  • PrintEmail Link
  • Viewed 3,061 times | Saved to 299 briefcases
Didow v Alberta Power Ltd, [1988] 5 WWR 606 (Alta CA)


Power company had poles with protrusions that extended over Didow’s land. Didow sued for trespass.


An intrusion that interferes with potential or actual use and enjoyment of the land constitutes trespass. There must also not be overriding policy considerations.


The court noted that the poles were permanent structures. Based on the Bernstein Test, there must be an infringement on the actual or potential uses of the land. In this case, there was.

The court then found that there were no overriding policy considerations.


Decision in favour of Didow; later overturned by legislation.


The defendants argued that airspace is common property (per the Air Canada case). They also argued, per Lacroix, that a landowner does not own airspace -- nobody owns it. This argument was not successful.

Leave a Comment

You must be logged in to participate.

This document is a general discussion of certain legal and related issues and must not be relied upon as legal advice. This document may not have been written or reviewed by a legal practitioner. For more information, please see the website Terms of Service.