FavoriteLoadingSave to briefcase | Rating: | By (2012)

  • PrintEmail Link
  • Viewed 14,462 times | Saved to 406 briefcases
Great Northern Railway Company v Witham (1873) Court of Common Pleas L.R. 9 C.P. 16


D was winning tender. P gave orders for steel and D would supply. D refused to supply. D says it wasn’t mutual (P didn’t bind themselves to anything to D shouldn’t be bound to supply)


Was their mutuality? Was there consideration?


There is consideration in unilateral contracts.
Mutuality is essential to consideration.
**Mutuality – something of value being given in exchange


Each time P placed an order it was a binding contract

Leave a Comment

You must be logged in to participate.

This document is a general discussion of certain legal and related issues and must not be relied upon as legal advice. This document may not have been written or reviewed by a legal practitioner. For more information, please see the website Terms of Service.