FavoriteLoadingSave to briefcase | Rating: | By (2012)

  • PrintEmail Link
  • Viewed 752 times | Saved to 294 briefcases
Hodgkinson v Martin, [1929] 1 DLR 367


Martin (M) removed Hodgkinson (H) from the office. M believed he had the right to do so. H charges M with trespass to the person.


Does M's mistake absolve him?


Sincere mistake is no excuse; but it may reduce damages to nominal damages.

Leave a Comment

You must be logged in to participate.

This document is a general discussion of certain legal and related issues and must not be relied upon as legal advice. This document may not have been written or reviewed by a legal practitioner. For more information, please see the website Terms of Service.