#1. C had car on street that was not registered. C had paid fee and was told renewal would be in mail. C didn't put apt # on it so it was returned.
#2. T driving without a license. T was young and said didn’t know what date on license meant
Is it a defence to be mislead as the law by a state official?
The defence of officially induced error is available in law
Defence of Official Induced Error – To meet must prove:
*That an error of law or of mixed law and fact was made
*That the person who committed the act considered the legal consequences of his or her actions
*That the advice obtained came from an appropriate official
*That the advice was reasonable (objective test)
*That the advice was erroneous, and
*That the person relied on the advice in committing the wrongful act (objective test)
Factors to look at for the reasonableness and the reliance on the advice:
**Efforts made by accused to obtain info, the clarity or obscurity of the law, position and role of the official who gave the info or opinion, and clarity, definitiveness and reasonableness of the info or opinion
The offences in question are strict liability offences and the respondents have not shown that hey exercised due diligence
It is not a defence to mislead as to the state of the law by a judge (Campbell)