FavoriteLoadingSave to briefcase | Rating: | By (2012)

  • PrintEmail Link
  • Viewed 2,766 times | Saved to 470 briefcases
Marshall v R, [1969] 3 CCC 149 (Alta CA)


There was marijuana in the car. Marshall was a passenger in the car. He knew the narcotics were in the car but did not touch or use them.


Was Marshall in joint possession? What is necessary to meet the requirements of possession in s.4(3) of the Criminal Code (Canada)?


In determining possession, per s.4(3) of the Criminal Code, there must be evidence of consent to prove the unlawful act.


Decision in favour of Marshall


There are three types of possession defined in s 4(3):
1. Personal;
2. Constructive (e.g. illegal material in a locker; control over something); or
3. Joint (possession with someone else).

To be in possession, requires:
1. Knowledge of the criminality associated with the item;
2. Consent (per Marshall v R (1969)); and
3. Control (per R v Terrence (1983)).

Leave a Comment

You must be logged in to participate.

This document is a general discussion of certain legal and related issues and must not be relied upon as legal advice. This document may not have been written or reviewed by a legal practitioner. For more information, please see the website Terms of Service.