FavoriteLoadingSave to briefcase | Rating: | By (2015)

  • PrintEmail Link
  • Viewed 67 times | Saved to 223 briefcases
Netherlands v. Azeta BV (1998), 128 ILR 688 (Dist. Ct. of Rotterdam)

Ratio:

A declaration from the ambassador or other competent authority regarding the diplomatic status of state assets must be accepted on its face.

Analysis:

Chile filed a letter from the foreign minister stating the bank accounts were intended for the running of the Chilean embassy. Upon receipt of this letter, the onus was on the creditor to prove the contrary, which it failed to do. The court held that Chile is entitled to claim immunity, and does not have to provide more detailed information about the bank accounts. To require more from Chile would constitute "an unacceptable interference under international law in the internal affairs of this mission."


Leave a Comment

You must be logged in to participate.

This document is a general discussion of certain legal and related issues and must not be relied upon as legal advice. This document may not have been written or reviewed by a legal practitioner. For more information, please see the website Terms of Service.