FavoriteLoadingSave to briefcase | Rating: | By (2012)

  • PrintEmail Link
  • Viewed 3,342 times | Saved to 298 briefcases
Photo Production Ltd v Securicor Transport Ltd, [1980] UKHL 2


S supplied night patrolman for P. He lit a fire and burnt down building. S had limitation clause saying they would not be liable for acts of employees unless it could have been foreseen


Can the exclusion or limiting clause be invoked?


True construction of the contract is the proper approach – you construe the contract – what does the clause say you must interpret it. (look at the words themselves and the intention of the parties) – even if major breach.
**Court said because of Suisse Atlantique notion of Fundamental Breach no longer law


Look at clause and if it was intended to apply to this breach, apply it and if not, don’t - determine if applies through true construction of the contract.
In the event of a breach, if the breach is important enough, they have a right to treat the contract at an end and sue for damages.


The words are clear – S could rely on the clause

Leave a Comment

You must be logged in to participate.

This document is a general discussion of certain legal and related issues and must not be relied upon as legal advice. This document may not have been written or reviewed by a legal practitioner. For more information, please see the website Terms of Service.