FavoriteLoadingSave to briefcase | Rating: | By (2012)

  • PrintEmail Link
  • Viewed 15,367 times | Saved to 536 briefcases
Popov v Hayashi, 2002 WL 31833731, (Cal Superior Ct)


Barry Bonds hit a record home run into the stands. Popov had put his glove up and made contact with the abandoned baseball, but was prevented from catching the ball when he was illegally attacked by a mob of people. Hayashi, away from the mob, saw the ball on the ground and picked it up. Popov claimed that the ball belonged to him; Hayashi claimed the same.


Does Popov have sufficient possession to claim a right against the whole world?


There are three criteria of possession:
** 1 -the object must be lost or abandoned
** 2 -intention to control to the exclusion of others
** 3 -actual physical control
*** If #2 and #3 are met, but actual physical control is prevented by an illegal act, courts may find a pre-possessory right based on equity.
*** physical control may also vary by context, the community of practice, and the object itself.


Decision: Pre-possessory right for Popov, possessory right for Hayashi


  1. Fiat Justitia Ruat Caelum 32

    Very concise, thanks!

Leave a Comment

You must be logged in to participate.

This document is a general discussion of certain legal and related issues and must not be relied upon as legal advice. This document may not have been written or reviewed by a legal practitioner. For more information, please see the website Terms of Service.