Undercover officer asked G for cocaine. G said he knew someone and if he drove G he would get some.
Has G acted for the purpose of aiding the trafficking of drugs or is he a mere purchaser?
Motive is relevant in order to distinguish between traffickers and purchasers – Dissent Poitras.
What is the definition of MR – someone whose acts are designed to aid the purchaser yet incidentally aid the seller, have assisted much more in the purchase than in the sale – as such they must share the culpability of the purchaser rather then vendor
G did far more than act as a purchaser- w/o Gs assistance the purchase never would have taken place