FavoriteLoadingSave to briefcase | Rating: | By (2012)

  • PrintEmail Link
  • Viewed 1,438 times | Saved to 419 briefcases
Ranson v Kitner, 31 Ill.App. 241 (Ill.Ct.App. 1889).


Kitner shot Ranson’s dog, thinking that it was a wolf.


Did the Kitner's mistake denote that no tort had occurred?


Liability for damages, caused by a person's own mistaken understanding of the facts, exists regardless of whether that person acted in good faith.

Leave a Comment

You must be logged in to participate.

This document is a general discussion of certain legal and related issues and must not be relied upon as legal advice. This document may not have been written or reviewed by a legal practitioner. For more information, please see the website Terms of Service.