FavoriteLoadingSave to briefcase | Rating: | By (2012)

  • PrintEmail Link
  • Viewed 2,883 times | Saved to 411 briefcases
Re Noble and Wolf [1948] OR 579 (HC)


A covenant that land should not be sold or transferred to Jews, Hebrews, Semitic, Negro, or coloured race or blood.
Wolf, an interested purchaser applied to have the covenant rendered invalid based on the fact it was against public policy.
This time cottage members from the surrounding property defended the covenant.


Is this covenant against public policy?


Common law rights are not to be deemed abrogated by statue, unless the legislation intent to do so is express.

If there is any doubt that there is a prevailing public policy, the benefit of the doubt is extended to the contract.


To extend public policy to invalidate this covenant is wrong.
*If there is any doubt as to the prevailing public policy or its effect, it is deemed to be the duty of the court to extend the benefit of the doubt to the contract which the supposed public policy is claimed to supersede.


The covenant is valid and enforceable. Motion dismissed.

Leave a Comment

You must be logged in to participate.

This document is a general discussion of certain legal and related issues and must not be relied upon as legal advice. This document may not have been written or reviewed by a legal practitioner. For more information, please see the website Terms of Service.