FavoriteLoadingSave to briefcase | Rating: | By (2012)

  • PrintEmail Link
  • Viewed 1,937 times | Saved to 266 briefcases
Ross v Registrar of Motor Vehicles et al., [1975] 1 SCR 5


Ross was convicted of driving while impaired under the Criminal Code. Judge allowed to restrict license and told the Registrar that his license was not suspended. Registrar suspended the license anyway in accordance with the provincial Act. Ross said the section from the provincial Act was invalid because it conflicted with the Criminal Code.


There will be no conflict when you can abide by one law of one jurisdiction without violating the other law of the other jurisdiction.


There is no conflict here: You can abide by the provincial law without violating the fed law:
**By following the stricter legislation, he is respecting both pieces of legislation.
**Laws are not making R do conflicting things.


Both acts are valid – provincal law can stand.


This is very narrow view of conflict.

Leave a Comment

You must be logged in to participate.

This document is a general discussion of certain legal and related issues and must not be relied upon as legal advice. This document may not have been written or reviewed by a legal practitioner. For more information, please see the website Terms of Service.