FavoriteLoadingSave to briefcase | Rating: | By (2012)

  • PrintEmail Link
  • Viewed 3,583 times | Saved to 373 briefcases
Trinity Western University v. British Columbia College of Teachers, [2001] 1 SCR 772


The Community Standards Act (CSA) requires every member to adhere to the following:
*Identification of homosexual behaviour is “sinful” and behaviour of other people who aren’t gays or lesbians are also targeted
*This is an teaching institution following a particular religious precept, given state recognition as a Christian institution


Is TWC’s policy discriminatory?


1) Narrowing the scope of rights in a context-heavy balancing practice when competing Charter rights conflict
2) Charter rights have co-equal status – not hierarchical; must be balanced against each other when they conflict


*We don’t really get a clear answer in this context: Court recognizes “competing interests” – the need balance religion and equality
*Describing homosexual as “sinful” must take into account context when considering if it is
*While in a state agency context, CSA would be absolutely inappropriate; but in the context of a religious institution, you may in fact have a different balance that needs to be struck
*Must delineate the rights depending on the particular context


Leave a Comment

You must be logged in to participate.

This document is a general discussion of certain legal and related issues and must not be relied upon as legal advice. This document may not have been written or reviewed by a legal practitioner. For more information, please see the website Terms of Service.