FavoriteLoadingSave to briefcase | Rating: | By (2012)

  • PrintEmail Link
  • Viewed 2,118 times | Saved to 449 briefcases
Wackett v Calder (1965), 51 DLR (2d) 598 (BC CA)


Wackett attached Calder outside a bar. C retaliated with 1 punch; turned to go back inside but got attacked again by W. C retaliated with 2nd punches, one of which was fairly injurious to W. C remained unharmed. W sued C for battery


Did C act in self-defence? Was it a reasonable use of force?


An act of repelling an (apprehended) attack does not need to be measured with complete exactitude or nicety.


Appeal allowed. C acted in self-defence.

Leave a Comment

You must be logged in to participate.

This document is a general discussion of certain legal and related issues and must not be relied upon as legal advice. This document may not have been written or reviewed by a legal practitioner. For more information, please see the website Terms of Service.